🔗 Share this article

Perhaps some of the most famous images of the 20th century portrays an unclothed girl, her arms spread wide, her face contorted in pain, her skin burned and flaking. She can be seen fleeing toward the camera as escaping an airstrike within South Vietnam. Nearby, youngsters are racing from the devastated hamlet of the region, with a background featuring thick fumes along with soldiers.

This International Effect from an Powerful Image

Shortly after its distribution in June 1972, this picture—formally called The Terror of War—turned into a pre-digital phenomenon. Seen and debated by millions, it's generally attributed for galvanizing global sentiment opposing the American involvement during that era. An influential critic subsequently remarked how the horrifically unforgettable picture of nine-year-old the subject suffering likely did more to fuel popular disgust regarding the hostilities compared to extensive footage of televised violence. An esteemed British documentarian who covered the war labeled it the single best photo from what became known as the televised conflict. Another veteran photojournalist declared that the picture is quite simply, among the most significant photographs ever taken, particularly of that era.

The Long-Standing Claim and a Recent Assertion

For half a century, the photograph was assigned to the work of a South Vietnamese photographer, a then-21-year-old South Vietnamese photojournalist working for the Associated Press during the war. But a controversial latest documentary released by a streaming service argues which states the iconic picture—widely regarded as the pinnacle of war journalism—might have been taken by a different man on the scene during the attack.

As presented in the documentary, The Terror of War was actually captured by a freelancer, who provided the images to the AP. The assertion, and its subsequent research, stems from a man named a former photo editor, who states that the dominant bureau head directed him to alter the image’s credit from the freelancer to Út, the sole agency photographer on site during the incident.

This Investigation to find the Real Story

The source, advanced in years, contacted an investigator a few years ago, seeking help in finding the uncredited photographer. He stated that, should he still be alive, he wanted to extend an acknowledgment. The journalist thought of the unsupported stringers he had met—comparing them to the stringers of today, just as independent journalists at the time, are routinely overlooked. Their work is often doubted, and they function amid more challenging conditions. They lack insurance, no retirement plans, little backing, they usually are without good equipment, making them extremely at risk when documenting in their own communities.

The investigator pondered: “What must it feel like for the individual who made this iconic picture, if indeed Nick Út didn’t take it?” As a photographer, he speculated, it must be deeply distressing. As a student of photojournalism, especially the highly regarded combat images of the era, it could prove reputation-threatening, perhaps legacy-altering. The revered heritage of the image within the diaspora was so strong that the director whose parents fled at the time was hesitant to take on the project. He expressed, “I didn’t want to disrupt the accepted account that Nick had taken the picture. And I didn’t want to disrupt the current understanding within a population that had long admired this accomplishment.”

The Inquiry Unfolds

Yet the two the investigator and the creator concluded: it was important posing the inquiry. As members of the press must hold everybody else in the world,” noted the journalist, “we have to are willing to address tough issues within our profession.”

The documentary documents the team while conducting their inquiry, from testimonies from observers, to public appeals in modern Ho Chi Minh City, to reviewing records from related materials captured during the incident. Their work lead to a name: Nguyễn Thành Nghệ, working for NBC that day who also sold photographs to the press on a freelance basis. According to the documentary, a moved Nghệ, currently advanced in age residing in the US, claims that he provided the photograph to the agency for minimal payment with a physical photo, yet remained plagued by not being acknowledged for years.

The Response and Ongoing Scrutiny

He is portrayed in the film, reserved and calm, however, his claim proved incendiary in the community of photojournalism. {Days before|Shortly prior to